From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows 64 port Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:21:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83pqc3v76i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120219211800.0000558f@unknown> <834numv7js.fsf@gnu.org> <4F428780.8070902@cs.ucla.edu> <4F4D507F.7030008@cs.ucla.edu> <834ntfwxa6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332505387 21770 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2012 12:23:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, schwab@linux-m68k.org, ajmr@ilovetortilladepatatas.com To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 23 13:23:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SB3WL-00080j-2D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:23:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47978 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB3WH-000114-BT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB3WA-0000zy-Nb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB3W5-0004Vc-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:22:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:47902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB3W4-0004VK-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:22:48 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M1C00E007KKO400@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:21:51 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.241.151]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M1C00EFS7OEOB00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:21:51 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149195 Archived-At: > From: Fabrice Popineau > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:27:15 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, ajmr@ilovetortilladepatatas.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I have another question related to strftime.c : is there any reason not to > use the system one on Windows ? Yes, there is: the one in Windows runtime libraries doesn't support some of the time format specifiers provided by the gnulib version we have in lib/.