From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:45:01 +0300 Message-ID: <83pq5ns32a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ipbfcu4o.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <878vcbcp1p.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347723907 14334 80.91.229.3 (15 Sep 2012 15:45:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 15:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 15 17:45:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TCuYO-0007Ca-Fg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 17:45:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49691 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCuYK-0000VQ-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCuYI-0000UM-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCuYH-00083Y-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:40212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCuYH-00081s-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAE00H00E8VY300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:44:59 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAE00HO6EEZOT40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:44:59 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <878vcbcp1p.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153327 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:56:50 +0200 >=20 > I understand that, but =C2=B119 seconds vs <1 second? Is that the = best VC > can do? If you see very different times inside and outside Emacs, then indeed something might be wrong with VC. But before you conclude that, I'd suggest to look up the commands that Emacs ran in your ~/.bzr.log, an= d then run them, verbatim, from the shell prompt.