From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Error while checking out the elpa branch Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 05:47:22 +0200 Message-ID: <83pq1yoks5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871ufzxdm8.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <838va6wuiy.fsf@gnu.org> <878v8n9eye.fsf@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356407286 8639 80.91.229.3 (25 Dec 2012 03:48:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 03:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 25 04:48:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TnLV2-0002CW-2e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 04:48:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54972 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnLUo-0001Dw-0l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 22:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnLUk-0001BI-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 22:47:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnLUh-0005CW-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 22:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:59910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnLUh-0005CO-7l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 22:47:55 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MFK00L00IC4HZ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 05:47:25 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MFK00L9IIJ1IO20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 05:47:25 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <878v8n9eye.fsf@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155871 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Cc: Juanma Barranquero , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 23:02:17 -0100 > > Hi Eli, > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> From: Juanma Barranquero > >> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:59:45 +0100 > >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Stefan Monnier > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I'm not happy about it either. > >> [...] > >> > Don't hold your breath. > >> > >> At which point (post-release) do we lose all faith and start looking > >> for alternatives? Yesterday's post by Alexander Belchenko and the many > >> replies it has generated (not!) isn't exactly reassuring. > > > > I asked Richard to see what can be done. > > Any updates on this? No.