From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mysterious gzipped images Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:20:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83pptjos04.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mwoul8sz.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376320818 19409 80.91.229.3 (12 Aug 2013 15:20:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 12 17:20:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V8tur-0002SW-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:20:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48988 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8tur-0003n4-9B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8tui-0003iq-Vj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:20:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8tue-0003Em-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:20:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:48540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8tud-0003BG-Tr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MRF00900BULG300@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:20:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MRF009V2BXEG000@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:20:02 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162618 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:05:35 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > >> Sure, renaming from `decompress-gzipped-region' to something more > >> prefixey would make sense. Do you prefer zlib (which is what the zlib > >> people call it), or libz (which is what all other people call their > >> libraries)? > > > > If (random 2) return 1, then "libz-" is the clear winner, but if it > > returns 0 then "zlib-" is way better. > > `zlib' won. I've now renamed the function. But having both "zlib" and "gzipped" in the name is redundant, I think. How about zlib-decompress-region?