From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rectangular regions Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:35:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83ppqia972.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52707D17.6010801@dancol.org> <8338niefba.fsf@gnu.org> <87a9hq8h7p.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <838ux8d05z.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2mjc49i.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9hnc2qv.fsf@gnu.org> <527408C4.9090503@dancol.org> <838ux7c1qt.fsf@gnu.org> <834n7vb85r.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383420939 2772 80.91.229.3 (2 Nov 2013 19:35:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Josh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 02 20:35:43 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vcgz0-0001y1-NP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:35:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42970 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vcgz0-0000Y6-9n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:35:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vcgyr-0000Xu-DY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:35:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vcgyi-0007z5-AY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:35:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:48472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vcgyi-0007z1-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:35:24 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVN00600IAQRN00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVN0065BIEYK380@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164878 Archived-At: > From: Josh > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 11:20:34 -0700 > Cc: Daniel Colascione , Stefan Monnier , > emacs-devel > > > The important questions: are these uses more frequent than using GUD > > on the same sources? > > As I never use GUD at all, yes. None of my Emacs-using coworkers do > either, FWIW. I'd be surprised if a large proportion of typical Emacs users > (i.e. not those who frequent emacs-devel) used GUD; do you have reason > to believe that is the case? Emacs is one of the best, if not the only, GUI front-end for GDB on Posix systems. Everybody _I_ work with use it when they work on Posix systems. (On Windows, they use MS tools, so GDB is not an issue.)