From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay issue Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:23:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83poynj0fh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fuzqr1iz.fsf@gnu.org> <8337vqqwz7.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4dhonng.fsf@gnu.org> <83two4olqj.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9k3mphx.fsf@gnu.org> <834mg2kvj7.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1upj6ml.fsf@gnu.org> <83si3kht2b.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449138296 26467 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2015 10:24:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuan MEI Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 03 11:24:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4R4A-0000Uu-3J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 11:24:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34424 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4R44-0005wJ-E8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:24:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57853) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4R3I-00051l-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:23:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4R3E-0006Do-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:23:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:37082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4R3E-0006Dh-OQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:23:48 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYS00F001QWW100@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:23:30 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYS00FF1275PBB0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:23:30 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195804 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:09:04 -0800 > From: Yuan MEI > Cc: emacs-devel > > Emacs.Geometry: 100x59+2+2 > > Without Cairo: > Width: 818 > Height: 1022 > > With Cairo: > Width: 818 > Height: 962 > > So for the same screen height, I gain 4 lines of text when using Cairo. So what is smaller with Cairo? The letters, the gap between the lines, the frame decorations? Where do those extra 60 pixels come from?