From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] programmer-dvorak input method Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 17:58:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83poxpdz5v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y4ceq4er.fsf@fastmail.com> <83fuymft4w.fsf@gnu.org> <831ta6exkd.fsf@gnu.org> <87io3hpsea.fsf@fastmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451404706 24962 80.91.229.3 (29 Dec 2015 15:58:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Joakim Jalap Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 29 16:58:25 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aDwfI-0002pM-KC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:58:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49043 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDwfI-00088x-5X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:58:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDwex-00086C-VT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:58:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDweu-0002VF-PJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDweu-0002VB-MP; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:58:00 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4492 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aDwer-0007qm-Pz; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:57:58 -0500 In-reply-to: <87io3hpsea.fsf@fastmail.com> (message from Joakim Jalap on Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:31:57 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197088 Archived-At: > From: Joakim Jalap > Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:31:57 +0100 > > John Wiegley writes: > > >>>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > >>> > . I rather think that input methods should all be bundled: they are > >>> > too small to justify a separate package, and too basic to ask users > >>> > to download them when they need them. > >>> > >>> I'm not against that, provided they need little maintenance after having been > >>> added. Does this mean created an "extra-inputs" project on ELPA, into which > >>> all these additions get added? > > > >> If that question was for me, I'm not sure I understand it. > > > > It was for you. So I'll just ask back: What were you suggesting the answer be > > to your point above? > > If I may be so bold as to speak for Eli, what I _think_ he meant was > that input methods should be bundled with "core" Emacs, and not reside > in ELPA Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for my ambiguous wording.