From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More tags/usertags on Debbugs? Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:24:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83poxbnrk3.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452324313 13371 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2016 07:25:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Xue Fuqiao Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 08:25:06 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHntY-0007pG-Q8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 08:25:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39405 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHntU-0001nk-PO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:25:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHntI-0001nT-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:24:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHntE-00036i-Th for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:24:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53163) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHntE-00036e-QR; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:24:44 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1988 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aHntE-0004l0-4L; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:24:44 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Xue Fuqiao on Sat, 9 Jan 2016 10:53:26 +0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197886 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 10:53:26 +0800 > From: Xue Fuqiao > > Currently, the available tags are: > patch|wontfix|moreinfo|unreproducible|fixed|notabug|easy|pending > > The available severity levels are: > critical|grave|serious|important|normal|minor|wishlist > > Would it be useful to add more tags or usertags to classify the bugs > further? For example: > > discussion|documentation|inprogress|gnulinux|ns|w32/w64|solaris|website|elpa We already have "w32", you can say reassign 1234 emacs,w32 and have it listed for both of these "packages". Other OS-specific tags can be used in the same way. However, this is rarely used. As for others, please describe them in several words, so that they could be discussed in a useful way. Thanks.