From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: xref-query-replace Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 22:40:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83poxamqpb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8360z2ojqd.fsf@gnu.org> <56912C28.8010002@yandex.ru> <831t9qogl8.fsf@gnu.org> <569139D1.5040907@yandex.ru> <83y4byn0jx.fsf@gnu.org> <56916801.4040907@yandex.ru> <83twmmms49.fsf@gnu.org> <56916BEB.3040705@yandex.ru> <83r3hqmrap.fsf@gnu.org> <56916F25.9090403@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452372066 31274 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2016 20:41:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 20:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 21:41:05 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Jr-0004hC-Vq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 21:41:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42882 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Jr-0004I4-An for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Jf-0004Hu-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:40:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Jb-00071v-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:40:51 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Jb-00071o-PG; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:40:47 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2714 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Jb-0001M0-29; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:40:47 -0500 In-reply-to: <56916F25.9090403@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:35:49 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197927 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:35:49 +0300 > > On 01/09/2016 11:27 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Or maybe just let it work in all XREF buffers, and trust the user that > > she knows what she is doing? > > I'd rather not. > > And, like I said, there are technical reasons for this to be hard to > support. I don't really understand why. But if you insist, the only way to explain this is to explicitly mention all the commands that produce "good" XREF buffers in the error message. Yes, it will be a long one. But that's not a catastrophe.