From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recent commit modifying mark-whole-buffer (master/aeb613ea95b7970e66d663ec5cba54e9ec0528fa) Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 08:24:30 +0300 Message-ID: <83pot7vfch.fsf@gnu.org> References: << <87lh3x4dkb.fsf@gnus.org> <83wpngx69z.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<<87fuu4bo3y.fsf@gnus.org> <83inz0wprx.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<<87shy4a8d4.fsf@gnus.org> <83fuu4wnmm.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<<87y47w5w0p.fsf@gnus.org>> <<83bn4swdif.fsf@gnu.org>> <0943fde5-ec4e-40f5-85da-6cfe258f0513@default>> <<83y47wuqvg.fsf@gnu.org>> <5d300040-5c85-4d4d-8fce-4949fa5f1651@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461993944 26417 80.91.229.3 (30 Apr 2016 05:25:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 05:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, Stephan.Mueller@microsoft.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 30 07:25:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1awNPO-0006zC-R3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 07:25:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57401 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awNPL-0005JG-1c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awNPC-00056v-Gj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:25:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awNP0-0005yP-Rb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:25:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awNOo-0005oD-Nq; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1548 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1awNOh-0000E1-IQ; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:24:55 -0400 In-reply-to: <5d300040-5c85-4d4d-8fce-4949fa5f1651@default> (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:49:20 -0700 (PDT)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203437 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:49:20 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stephan.Mueller@microsoft.com > > > > I think the prompt should be more amenable to Lisp (not > > > done in C), and that any prompt features (including text > > > properties, including `face' and read-only) should be default > > > behavior only. At least a start would be to allow code to > > > provide a propertized prompt (esp. wrt `face') and have that > > > be used/respected and not overwridden. > > > > There's already a face 'minibuffer-prompt', so I'm not sure what else > > needs to be done wrt the face of the prompt. > > See "should be default behavior only". See "what should be the non-default behavior". And all your examples are about stiff that isn't minibuffer prompts anyway.