From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reload file from disk Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 13:55:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83po8pni6p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zi7tdvj5.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <83vaihnm63.fsf@gnu.org> <83shdlnln4.fsf@gnu.org> <877eux6q66.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510401338 1627 195.159.176.226 (11 Nov 2017 11:55:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Florian Weimer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 11 12:55:34 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDUNp-0008WB-Dv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 12:55:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45254 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDUNv-0003YA-89 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:55:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44055) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDUNl-0003Xo-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:55:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDUNi-0007BF-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:55:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDUNi-0007B6-Bf; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:55:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2015 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eDUNh-00081U-PN; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:55:26 -0500 In-reply-to: <877eux6q66.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (message from Florian Weimer on Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:54:57 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220067 Archived-At: > From: Florian Weimer > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:54:57 +0100 > > > Sorry, I see that I misunderstood your somewhat ambiguous wording. I > > see what you meant now, and the answer is the same: customize > > file-name-at-point-functions to nil, and both the behaviors that > > annoyed you will be gone. > > The documentation for find-file et al. still could use some updating > and a reference to file-name-at-point-functions. For some reason, I > was unable to find the latter. You are absolutely right, which is why I just updated the documentation, both the doc strings and the manual, to mention this. I was astonished to find out that this feature was first introduced in Emacs 23.2(!), but never mentioned even in NEWS. > (I still find the default behavior thoroughly bizarre, but that's > probably a matter of taste.) I'm with you, but it looks like we are the minority nowadays. Thanks for bringing up this awful gap in documentation.