From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell* Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 21:00:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83pnx2ai7m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sh1y535s.fsf@web.de> <8336tyc1ou.fsf@gnu.org> <87mus64wwr.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537812001 18325 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2018 18:00:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 24 19:59:57 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4V9J-0004f8-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:59:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46368 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4VBP-0006M5-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4VAN-0006KX-Ly for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:01:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4VAK-0005mQ-Rv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4VAI-0005lq-Vl; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:00:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4844 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1g4VAF-0006jv-S7; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:00:58 -0400 In-reply-to: <87mus64wwr.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:39:48 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230032 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:39:48 +0200 > > > Is it while-no-input that returns immediately, or is it sit-for? > > If I repeat the recipe with only `sit-for', I get no interrupt, so > `w-n-i' seems involved. What do you mean by "no interrupt"? > I started ls -R in *shell* and evaluated > > (progn (sit-for 100) > (message "!!!")) > > The *shell* buffer got still filled, but the !!! message only appeared > after I had hit a key. > > Is a bug report justified? It cannot hurt, especially if you could come up with a convenient reproducer.