From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs i18n Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:22:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83pnqjs4i8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o97aq6gz.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tvgoud56.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83o96wk2mi.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1hjfvjd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871s3p0zdz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h8ckezyt.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8cjspc0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <29a53a39-fa50-1e94-9420-a3ea1250aa44@gmail.com> <83d0mkt0jp.fsf@gnu.org> <3937b930-c7fa-de35-af66-2df8655579c7@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="2697"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, brandelune@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 22 09:25:38 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FUe-0000aJ-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:25:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53794 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FUd-00052F-I8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FUS-000501-4p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:25:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FRO-0004IF-CU; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:22:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2647 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h7FRF-00026e-DC; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:22:05 -0400 In-reply-to: <3937b930-c7fa-de35-af66-2df8655579c7@gmail.com> (message from =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:03:31 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234526 Archived-At: > Cc: brandelune@gmail.com, juri@linkov.net, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Clément Pit-Claudel > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:03:31 -0400 > > > Whether we like it or not, it's one of the standard methods of solving > > these situations. It might sound somewhat more awkward in some > > languages than the original wording, but it has other more important > > advantages. > > I don't understand: what does this change buy us currently, except the awkward wording? It brings us a step closer to the i18n goal. A very small step, admittedly, but step in the right direction nonetheless.