From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 11:37:37 +0300 Message-ID: <83pnohbhny.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831s0xd3z1.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="256542"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 10:37:59 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRYNJ-0014XL-N8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 10:37:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRYNI-0003sW-3S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 04:37:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRYN8-0003sB-MQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 04:37:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38242) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRYN8-0006u3-91; Fri, 17 May 2019 04:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4552 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hRYN7-00083Y-Hd; Fri, 17 May 2019 04:37:46 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 17 May 2019 08:12:41 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236634 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 08:12:41 +0200 > > > Do we have a means to tell the byte-compiler "don't emit this specific > > warning for that function"? If not, perhaps we should. > > Yes, that would be very nice. Perhaps a general er form? Like... > > (without-byte-compilation-warnings > ...) > > Hm, that's perhaps too general. What about: > > (without-byte-compilation-warning 'callargs > ...) I thought about something even more focused, like (declare 'warning-about-arguments-mismatch 'off) inside the function's body.