From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making Emacs more friendly to newcomers Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:55:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83pnbyckvv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <863691n4xl.wl-me@enzu.ru> <87imhw431x.fsf@yahoo.com> <87mu78huhx.fsf_-_@yahoo.com> <87k12bdgx7.fsf@yahoo.com> <87r1wi7a8o.fsf@yahoo.com> <875zdteybt.fsf@runbox.com> <87368wrvf5.fsf@yahoo.com> <86k126d83n.wl-me@enzu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="112614"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, theophilusx@gmail.com, stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, luangruo@yahoo.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, seb@k-7.ch, simenheg@runbox.com To: Ahmed Khanzada Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 23 16:55:59 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRdGg-000T8a-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:55:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44952 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRdGf-0001mO-6v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:55:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRdG3-0001Jz-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:55:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRdG1-0001ym-Ix; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1093 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jRdG0-0003sa-8G; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:55:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86k126d83n.wl-me@enzu.ru> (message from Ahmed Khanzada on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:33:32 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247585 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:33:32 -0700 > From: Ahmed Khanzada > Cc: Yuan Fu , Tim Cross , > Stefan Kangas , Emacs developers , > Stefan Monnier , > Sébastien Gendre , > Simen Heggestøyl > > I wonder what kind of effect it will have on the community when > packages in the same domain compete to be "anointed" as the package that > Emacs shall recommend for a particular file type or feature. We have several of such "competitors" already in core. Did anything bad happen? And it isn't like packages are lining up to be included in Emacs, or even "anointed" by it, is it? Boy, I'd like to be there.