From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs]
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:14:24 +0300
Message-ID: <83pnb64c5b.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <E1jYBUR-0005xj-04@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <35DBF02E-44D7-41E5-A217-7D6EC84ED221@icloud.com>
 <E1jYLOw-00046I-5q@fencepost.gnu.org> <jwvblmt4xqq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <E1jYiWR-00014m-9D@fencepost.gnu.org> <jwvsgg4t41j.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <E1jZ68Y-0006Ze-SC@fencepost.gnu.org> <jwvlfluprar.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CAGK7Mr4KK+6Firpgq7U=ahG0vXftjbrXsLzeA4XC=g71=kcsuw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="1501"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: rms@gnu.org, joostkremers@fastmail.fm, Emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org,
 monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, pcr910303@icloud.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk
To: Philippe Vaucher <philippe.vaucher@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 14 20:15:26 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jZIOD-0000Fu-Kd
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 20:15:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52028 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jZIOC-00026b-M3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 14:15:24 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46988)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jZINf-0001ZX-SE
 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 14:14:51 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39727)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jZINf-0007g1-CS; Thu, 14 May 2020 14:14:51 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2397 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jZINU-000633-Lk; Thu, 14 May 2020 14:14:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAGK7Mr4KK+6Firpgq7U=ahG0vXftjbrXsLzeA4XC=g71=kcsuw@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Philippe Vaucher on Thu, 14 May 2020 17:28:24 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250272
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/250272>

> From: Philippe Vaucher <philippe.vaucher@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:28:24 +0200
> Cc: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>, Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm>,
>  Emacs developers <Emacs-devel@gnu.org>, "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org>,
>  조성빈 <pcr910303@icloud.com>,
>  Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@russet.org.uk>
> 
>  Most people (somewhat wrongly) think of GNU ELPA as a *distribution*
>  site for third party packages, like MELPA.
> 
> I just wanted to confirm that it's indeed the case for a lot of users.

It sounds like the fundamental disagreements regarding what ELPA is
and why it exists are even wider than I thought.  The more we discuss
this, the wider it seems to become.  It's little wonder we cannot
agree on more complex issues wrt ELPA when something so basic is
subject to controversy.