From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 14:26:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83pmtpyk5x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <83bl5dsh8b.fsf@gnu.org> <8335qps8vs.fsf@gnu.org> <9471c28f-8eae-b555-ee86-9fffd6229937@yandex.ru> <83bl5ayyym.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgsu428b.fsf@gnus.org> <369cfa83-fb3d-d452-94b1-64dbd6dc0253@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16454"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, danflscr@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org, john@yates-sheets.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 03 13:51:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mM7jb-00046p-AG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 13:51:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46578 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM7ja-0004Us-9b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 07:51:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM7LL-0007M8-NF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 07:26:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM7LI-00031f-MT; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 07:26:45 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1532 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM7LB-0006I5-Qr; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 07:26:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <369cfa83-fb3d-d452-94b1-64dbd6dc0253@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:59:37 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273767 Archived-At: > Cc: philipk@posteo.net, danflscr@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, john@yates-sheets.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:59:37 +0300 > > A key bindings theme is a nice enough concept (for example, to create a > native set of key bindings that follows the CUA convention). For that, > indeed what's left is for someone to do the work. > > Which is significant -- moving all current default bindings around to > free up C-x, C-c, C-v, C-a and C-z is a big task, especially if one > wants to interoperate with bindings made by third-party modes as well. > > But I don't really want to migrate to CUA, personally. Do we not want > our other users to enjoy undo-redo? Having a separate theme for every > little proposed change seems silly. > > And having a theme to just make indent-tabs-mode behavior sane, that > would just be ridiculous. Figuring out these (and other) issues is indeed not trivial. I still hope someone will pick up the gauntlet, though.