From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eglot manual suggestions Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 20:03:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83pmehp31g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bkq1qkik.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12528"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 19:56:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1on1gU-00034T-0t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 19:56:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1on0rS-00080d-V5; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1on0rR-00080M-Er for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1on0rR-0008U8-3C; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:03:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=VGiqbYfVU5+45WOJ0l+434BeTAWr9+HF2GbGQYCSr64=; b=M7aP5nH3WRy1zmlIexr/ OIxKmpX/4hue3pvxHi4AgCCKYyCV4jfPFmRIQ2Csy9CHlqqw0rcWKdngGyUVX8c/aYIJ6x4bkKdnl gWaPS9dtkyvXZ//HTdXYcqluU2TGSfNwA4qXYpSJjRszJURKnHtzkD7v1DzIaJqra2tBR77RZoLqa LTdGrxkF8UjEKsq4A/XYdhBPKQ6EwlQx8pH+tPpYOnA54OUJh6grON2CE+wEtdRVwJP+Gx2qix6rU D2I1wwdnzevOsR3XHZ62t05v11o2iUg5hW3Nv4MrXeWL+fzlNZ9RNBssoSlzUZ375k/9PW6aWsB/Y BJr2B4XAAexanw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1on0rQ-0000hC-Hv; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:03:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bkq1qkik.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:00:35 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298404 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:00:35 +0200 > > Normally, Iʼd just commit this, but I feel the Grammar Dragon has been > poked enough for one week. I care not a whit if these are > characterised as 'style changes' or 'grammar corrections', but I feel > they are improvements. In general, LGTM, thanks. However, ... > -Eglot uses the Emacs's project management infrastructure to figure out > +Eglot uses the Emacs project management infrastructure to figure out Is "Emacs's" really wrong? > -This section provides a reference of the most commonly used Eglot > +This section provides a reference for the most commonly used Eglot Is "reference of" incorrect? > -To have Eglot stay away of some Emacs feature, add that feature's > +To have Eglot stay away from some Emacs feature, add that feature's "Stay away of" is incorrect? > -If possible, we recommend to use these configuration files that are > +If possible, we recommend to use those configuration files that are > independent of Eglot and Emacs; they have the advantage that they will > work with other LSP clients as well. > > If you do need to provide Emacs-specific configuration for a language > -server, we recommend to define the appropriate value in the > +server, we recommend defining the appropriate value in the Here, you contradict yourself: if "recommend to use" is OK, then why "recommend to define" isn't? And AFAIU, both forms are correct English. Also, why "those" in preference to "these"?