From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Enlarge dumped_data[] Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:20:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83pmb2g39b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87edrj4fnq.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87edrj4fnq.fsf@yahoo.com> <834jsehl1x.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8ku3j75.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10278"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 25 14:20:27 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKfhQ-0002Vh-St for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:20:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKfgs-0007Vh-FA; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:19:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKfgq-0007M9-Ae for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:19:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKfgp-0002o5-Km; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:19:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=gsn2mbJxaQmYCAxc6SPMnZRYv/2nr4NYCu8SCsgm9lU=; b=Z/LKpKJLrfMU cnK5TQzzkYemzfv3Ml3YYDvqieX4vH8Y72yXx5pA/XqrKromrcztu9JeInSpaMkFfZGkF4F4EeJas FUbxTDyygWk/4O4PeUzOpdOA/L1mOAq3InctIzXgu+NdwHmGSRQJ5rx+dNwYI0lS8WuqSXZd9oW4j PAZjQuUhswsVki79XegQKCEnONd7eaiujk/2ZAWFzGOHvIkQzRjmg5THpe4DiFKN0yKZSdAraYeRX XociSCah5M5oJVccrQaZIFzESeeJHQYZW43I0w/oTiXwCLBIgEAGXq6nHZ0sIRaiCWCO+LVhi1TW5 z/tWjHXfD3+14vfnIQWvZA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKfgo-0002ex-S1; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:19:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v8ku3j75.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:14:06 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302650 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:14:06 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > The 64-bit unexec build on GNU/Linux reports about 21MB of static heap > > used up, and that with only a few *.el files, the rest *.elc. So I > > think 13MB on Windows is not outrageous. I'm okay with increasing the > > value, especially since most builds will be unaffected anyway. > > Okay, should the adjustment be made on emacs-29 or master? If you see the problem on emacs-29, please install the change there. If it happens only on master, please install on master.