From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Android port Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 15:42:38 +0300 Message-ID: <83pm40pcjl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1428589171.162865.1691134964773@mail1.libero.it> <87il9s5vmv.fsf@yahoo.com> <83zg34pi7p.fsf@gnu.org> <9065382.vXJBWSPEcx@nimes> <83tttcpeof.fsf@gnu.org> <875y5s5p50.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33828"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: bruno@clisp.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, angelo.g0@libero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 06 14:43:34 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qSd6b-0008V7-Je for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 14:43:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSd5W-0005aD-FZ; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 08:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSd5U-0005a2-DV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 08:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSd5S-0007iH-7s; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 08:42:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ogBqDAQU12nRrAiBvCwOmXUDeBC4lUILgEkE2D++KG4=; b=SoGJFY9ykCpq hq2mr7pYO7y2416X0chNJaBoaKo60EfunAa8Ml+VVgLpa4psV56m/l4UHzbXO0qRZPp5Io1S6bUB2 QkPyx+Vi4NbjijbNkkl8CA5EyQspi2JkVQZ535ZzcAN1KKYJAuu8h4uSEfjd/76nwLYnjxUOjRvKi yjTrAFnUKHwBT5ZZ183DQxf9NS2huIBjoHDDYMHGIA+fB6ScvdoZrtua6LHs0TRbvSOG/fvSHUqQ1 FxLLufhrhRdcuv4QsCQeyTcdrXqjTvj5c6W9YuyfQyf3aL67a7mRMoL4II1DkUndLloZAmCjvcM25 rUuPdLa5cQWiIMJh0e+MFw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSd5R-0007f3-No; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 08:42:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875y5s5p50.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sun, 06 Aug 2023 20:30:51 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308358 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: Bruno Haible , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, > angelo.g0@libero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 20:30:51 +0800 > > Everyone, > > This conversation is fast on track to becoming unmanageable. Since the > Gnulib developers believe that the solution presently in place on the > branch is acceptable, and it _does_ work to the best of our knowledge, > how about merging the branch and shelving this conjecture for the time > being? Personally, I feel that it's unlikely that any other Gnulib > module we import will make use of the test results that are overridden, > as the printf modules are self-contained. We can always assess the > impact of future changes to Gnulib when they are merged into Emacs. I understand your POV, but I would like to give this discussion some more time before we make the decision. We do want to merge the branch, but a day or two more while we discuss alternatives won't change anything.