From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making gnulib imports build on Windows Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:04:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83oc73vvoh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vd1bwjig.fsf@gnu.org> <4D4096AC.7020200@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296101870 10269 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2011 04:17:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 27 05:17:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiJIm-00064m-O1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:17:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51002 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiJ60-00008Y-El for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59972 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiJ5r-0008WR-Ia for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:04:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiJ5q-0007sn-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:04:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:52706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiJ5p-0007sj-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LFN00800XYJ1700@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:04:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.46.39]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LFN008ASXZ71500@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:04:20 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4D4096AC.7020200@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135072 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:48:28 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 01/26/11 11:29, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > 2) Have a maintainer-only rule to produce getopt.h for Windows (by > > using Sed). > > Yes, that sounds like the best approach to me as well. Thanks for the feedback. > I expect this sort of thing can be useful for other tasks needed for > an MS-DOS build. I wasn't talking about the MS-DOS build (which already uses Sed and the original Makefile.in files, so there's no issues in that case). I was talking about the MS-Windows build, which has its own makefile.w32-in templates. The issue is what to put in makefile.w32-in that does the equivalent of editing of *.in.h files.