From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:48:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83obi07wws.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <838v96dgyd.fsf@gnu.org> <8338zecu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcc9aa4a.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj7c8fkn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355284184 31934 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2012 03:49:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 12 04:49:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TidKS-0006la-I7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:49:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TidKF-0003LB-S8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:49:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TidK8-0003L4-LA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:49:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TidK6-0003Xb-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:49:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:58222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TidK6-0003XQ-6u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:49:30 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEW00F00FTLF200@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:48:55 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEW00FFEFXJET20@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:48:55 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155500 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:58:33 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > As expected. So, if compiling the C sources takes 1 min and compiling > > the Lisp files takes 6.5 min, how come the bootstrap takes 15 min? > > What else takes 7.5 min? > > I don't know. It seems that a bootstrap is not equivalent to the sum > of the two commands we've measured. The only other thing is deleting files at the beginning of bootstrap. I suggest to bootstrap with a clock in your hand, and make notes about the times each part takes. There are at least 5 min more to gain here, so I think you should be motivated enough ;-)