From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:15:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83obeuyz6u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83sj46z468.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362737770 11205 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2013 10:16:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bzg@gnu.org, lele@metapensiero.it, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: joakim@verona.se Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 11:16:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UDuLn-0002wY-NP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:16:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38089 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDuLR-0003jA-SO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 05:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDuLK-0003iy-Cc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 05:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDuLF-0001NQ-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 05:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:40177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDuL9-0001Lo-U8; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 05:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MJC00C00737IW00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:15:50 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MJC00CWZ76DIU10@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:15:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157599 gmane.emacs.orgmode:67925 Archived-At: > From: joakim@verona.se > Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:15:07 +0100 > Cc: bzg@gnu.org, lele@metapensiero.it, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, > Leo Liu , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > - Emacs "trunk" could be stripped of all but the bare essentials to > achieve bootstrap. > - distribution tarballs could be made from trunk+elpa. > > Since I dont do releases for Emacs I dont get to have an opinion on the > matter, but if pressed, I would say this idea has considerable merit. It also has at least one demerits: people who track the trunk will not necessarily use the revisions of packages from elpa that will be included in Emacs tarballs. That will probably mean longer and more painful pretests, and some of the advantages of having a publicly accessible development trunk will be lost.