From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Menus with more items than the TTY can display Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:30:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83ob6mmw9j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a9igrqq1.fsf@gnu.org> <5257E3B3.4070508@yandex.ru> <834n8nswas.fsf@gnu.org> <831u3nrhf9.fsf@gnu.org> <525D8938.6080208@gmx.at> <83hacipd88.fsf@gnu.org> <525E43D8.6060109@gmx.at> <83bo2pp7kd.fsf@gnu.org> <525ED0CE.9010001@gmx.at> <834n8hozdu.fsf@gnu.org> <525EDC1A.9070201@gmx.at> <83y55tnii4.fsf@gnu.org> <525FADCF.5010700@gmx.at> <83ob6nonry.fsf@gnu.org> <52601ACA.9070603@gmx.at> <83iowvokoj.fsf@gnu.org> <526025E8.20009@gmx.at> <83fvrzoe6o.fsf@gnu.org> <83eh7joda2.fsf@gnu.org> <5260E981.6020604@gmx.at> <8361suorfj.fsf@gnu.org> <52614739.9040901@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382110261 16930 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2013 15:31:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 18 17:31:04 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VXC0y-0001HF-2X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:31:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58324 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXC0x-0005S5-M5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXC0p-0005Rn-RX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:30:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXC0i-0000PB-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:30:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:50376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXC0i-0000Ox-N8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:30:44 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MUV00E00F26DJ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:30:43 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MUV00ENBF371EB0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:30:43 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <52614739.9040901@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164312 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:35:37 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > What, you mean neither of the display corruptions happen with the > > above breakpoint active? Then it sounds like we have some timing or > > race condition problems, and debugging this will be very hard indeed. > > Debugging this way extremely slows down movement in the menu. Yes, but it's unclear to me why should this change the phenomenon. > > Let's try to see the problem from the other end. Please do: > > > > M-x open-termscript RET SOME-FILE RET > > > > then hit F10, type C-n and/or C-p several times, make sure the problem > > happens, then exit Emacs and then post SOME-FILE. > > Attached as ts.txt. It looks like we are completely delusional in what we write. I will need to think about this some more. > > (Btw, this warrants a bug filed long ago. So please do, and let's > > continue there.) > > I'm already quite confused with the present TTY threads The only one that is still active is this one. There's a sufficient amount of information posted here to make it unwise to continue here.