From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:50:29 +0300 Message-ID: <83oatjapq2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y4t9m76w.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83lhopb1bp.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412956272 23042 80.91.229.3 (10 Oct 2014 15:51:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien?= Aptel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 10 17:51:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XccTA-0001AS-N7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:51:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49152 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XccTA-0001Hs-CI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:51:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XccSr-0001HJ-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XccSk-0003Q8-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:50:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:54034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XccSk-0003Q1-KS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:50:38 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ND800I00JWDID00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:50:37 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ND800INIK0CI600@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:50:37 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175224 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:05:06 +0200 > From: Aur=C3=A9lien Aptel > Cc: Emacs development discussions >=20 > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Well, how about removing this issue by using lt_dlopenext? >=20 > I use the .so extension to know whether a file is a binary module o= r > elisp (compiled or source). You cannot know that by the extension alone, anyway. It's unreliable= . So that problem cannot be solved by using the extension explicitly. > I'm not familiar enough with every system but having only one > extension per system is maybe limiting. Emacs can use a list of extensions, not just a single extension.