From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More metaproblem Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:01:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83oarj4r2l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20141203192721.GE12748@thyrsus.com> <547F6774.50700@cs.ucla.edu> <838uio5vjw.fsf@gnu.org> <20141203211447.GB15111@thyrsus.com> <871toge5zw.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> <83388v6hsq.fsf@gnu.org> <85egsfpytd.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83sigv4ttc.fsf@gnu.org> <20141204102742.GA31661@thyrsus.com> <871tofvh2g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417690894 13020 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2014 11:01:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 04 12:01:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwUA3-00087w-0k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:01:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45303 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwUA2-0006Qn-7j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:01:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwU9k-0006Qe-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwU9e-0008B5-HX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:01:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:40375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwU9W-00089o-75; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:00:54 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NG200100133YP00@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:58:40 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NG200LJ815SH350@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:58:40 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <871tofvh2g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178818 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:35:03 +0100 > > >> Maybe we should simply move all that into etc/CONTRIBUTE, and leave in > >> admin/notes only stuff that is minor/obscure etc. > > > > I agree, and was intending to suggest that myself. > > admin/notes should only contain stuff relevant for people with push > access. Preparing a patch does not entail that. We can have a section there labeled "if you have write access to the repository". I see nothing wrong with that, and no need to have yet another file with possibly contradictory instructions.