From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Too many warnings building Emacs with GCC 6 on MSYS2-MinGW64 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 05:37:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83oa48fiqn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <50083875-fbf6-d6b2-ffac-08c17c2bc696@alice.it> <83r395ko7o.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9a1kks6.fsf@gnu.org> <8337lklqrl.fsf@gnu.org> <11ac6b41-3a59-ec19-c414-151c08a91ba3@alice.it> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472697493 8392 195.159.176.226 (1 Sep 2016 02:38:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 02:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kbrown@cornell.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Angelo Graziosi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 01 04:38:09 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfHtH-0001Y7-Qf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 04:38:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56733 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfHtF-0004Y8-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38481) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfHsd-0004Xz-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:37:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfHsa-00020l-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:37:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfHsa-00020M-Aa; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4401 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bfHsV-0004Jm-6d; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:37:19 -0400 In-reply-to: <11ac6b41-3a59-ec19-c414-151c08a91ba3@alice.it> (message from Angelo Graziosi on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 21:56:45 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207041 Archived-At: > From: Angelo Graziosi > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 21:56:45 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > As always, Ken's suggestions are right! > > Now this test case, > > $ cat test.c > /*#include */ > #include > > /*extern intptr_t execve (const char *, char * const *, char * const *);*/ > /*extern intptr_t execve (const char *, char * const [], char * const []);*/ > extern int execve (const char *, char * const *, char * const *); > > int main() > { > return 0; > } > > builds without warnings with > > $ gcc -Wall test.c Thanks. What happens if you remove the unistd.h inclusion?