From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: request to reconsider libnettle/libhogweed (was: How to ship native modules?) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:55:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83o9xjn06c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a89gq3us.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmtjiv0w.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488470197 16519 195.159.176.226 (2 Mar 2017 15:56:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 15:56:37 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 02 16:56:33 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjT5e-0003LP-FI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:56:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53053 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjT5k-0007Ly-A7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 10:56:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjT4i-0007FB-B1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 10:55:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjT4f-0000Y4-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 10:55:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjT4f-0000Xw-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 10:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1845 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cjT4e-0005fz-Dy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 10:55:24 -0500 In-reply-to: <87bmtjiv0w.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Thu, 02 Mar 2017 09:59:59 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212711 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 09:59:59 -0500 > > * personally, I would rather make the core more functional out of the > box, so my proposal is to go back to the original C patch instead of > inventing a module distribution system. (A module distribution system > may yet make sense, and I have nothing against it, but I don't want to > wait more years for it or invent it.) Please show the patch, perhaps after updating it to match the current master, and let's discuss then. Thanks.