From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ? Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 10:43:44 +0300 Message-ID: <83o9ueiw27.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2623E5C5-4D40-4C9F-BFF6-181D2E69F984@gmail.com> <831srgnuyc.fsf@gnu.org> <83vaormn2x.fsf@gnu.org> <1B4DE39C-E293-4370-9E76-82E1B7385C00@gmail.com> <83o9ugjaqd.fsf@gnu.org> <8737br8n4o.fsf@x230.lts> <36B505D7-E395-41F2-81C3-EE6C7265E754@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495871071 6762 195.159.176.226 (27 May 2017 07:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 07:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 27 09:44:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dEWOi-0001g4-BK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 09:44:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39737 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEWOn-0000DQ-Uo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 03:44:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEWO4-0000Cf-Ky for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 03:43:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEWO1-0002oJ-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 03:43:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEWO1-0002oF-EN; Sat, 27 May 2017 03:43:45 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2039 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dEWO0-0002T5-HX; Sat, 27 May 2017 03:43:45 -0400 In-reply-to: <36B505D7-E395-41F2-81C3-EE6C7265E754@gmail.com> (message from Jean-Christophe Helary on Sat, 27 May 2017 10:16:14 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215256 Archived-At: > From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 10:16:14 +0900 > > Yes but from what I've seen in package/el, a lot of translatable texts are not displayed with "message". Some > use "error", some use other mechanisms. Internally, they all boil down to a small set of C functions, which is where we should make these changes.