From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Flymake refactored
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 16:44:31 +0300
Message-ID: <83o9pjt6m8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87h8vmj3tr.fsf@lolita> <1507138648.1972.0@smtp.gmail.com>
	<874lre2von.fsf@gmail.com> <87mv566yjx.fsf@udel.edu>
	<87shex276r.fsf@gmail.com> <87efqh2sud.fsf@udel.edu>
	<877ew919hd.fsf@gmail.com> <jwvd1612bmn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<87poa0z4ur.fsf@gmail.com>
	<jwvr2ufytrl.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507383900 30946 195.159.176.226 (7 Oct 2017 13:45:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 13:45:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 07 15:44:53 2017
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1e0pPR-0006Pv-Df
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:44:53 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49821 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1e0pPT-0000ID-DT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:44:55 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33186)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1e0pPG-0000Ge-Ue
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:44:43 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1e0pPC-0003eg-2w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:44:42 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47521)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1e0pPB-0003eS-V9; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:44:37 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2844
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1e0pPB-00011w-7i; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:44:37 -0400
In-reply-to: <jwvr2ufytrl.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org> (message from
	Stefan Monnier on Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:28:04 -0400)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219220
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/219220>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:28:04 -0400
> 
> > Yes, that is the natural way. But should it go into the emacs-26 branch?
> 
> I'll let Eli&John decide.

If it's just a Flymake back-end, and doesn't affect anything else
unless activated, I see no reason not to have it on the release
branch, assuming that its support in the version of Flymake on the
release branch is reasonably good.

Thanks.