From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Relics of removed dir-locals-file-2 feature in pretest Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:36:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83o9nm3zv1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <833757cqy7.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvxmbat5.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgiyb801.fsf@gnu.org> <83d149at4o.fsf@gnu.org> <831skobvvw.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2sj66m6.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8tf638h.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3mq48xx.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvxe47gu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511901883 7812 195.159.176.226 (28 Nov 2017 20:44:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com To: Davis Herring Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 28 21:44:37 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJmk4-0001Jx-D2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:44:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40039 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJmkB-0001VN-F4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:44:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48141) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJmc8-0002wZ-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:36:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJmc3-0005LY-Dq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:36:20 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJmc3-0005LS-9x; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:36:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3390 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eJmc2-0002h2-43; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:36:15 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Davis Herring on Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:02:40 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220510 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Davis Herring > Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:02:40 -0700 > > > Why is that important? It's a nuisance to remember to add the > > brackets, so I'd prefer to avoid that. > > For reference, RFC 3986 encourages as one of > several styles for delimiting URIs. It's still a nuisance. And we have features to follow URL at point (it's even turned on by default). My vote is NO.