From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Preview: portable dumper Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:23:12 +0200 Message-ID: <83o9kodf27.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1775923222.898447.1518559575706@mail.libero.it> <83inb0xkfx.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9krdftc.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7wby1x4.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2pnwftj.fsf@gnu.org> <08ac43fb-0b13-8a51-4571-11a21b8ffbdc@dancol.org> <83h8qiw7cd.fsf@gnu.org> <837erddpqb.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1518801763 5977 195.159.176.226 (16 Feb 2018 17:22:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 16 18:22:39 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emjiJ-0000X4-8B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:22:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42514 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emjkL-00068J-A7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:24:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emjj7-00066W-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:23:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emjj7-0004dX-0U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:23:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emjj6-0004dN-Se; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:23:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2536 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1emjj6-0002Aw-50; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:23:12 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Andy Moreton on Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:50:55 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222833 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:50:55 +0000 > > > In general, breaking the read into chunks of INT_MAX should work as > > well, but I'd like to know first what's going on in emacs_intr_read, > > because perhaps there's a more elegant solution we have available. > > Given the mismatch between sys_read/_read and read, doesn't the smae > problem exist elsewhere in emacs also ? That other place is emacs_intr_read.