From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split `simple.el'? Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 22:37:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83o9iy3gri.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5f1e960c-483f-4902-b4c2-b7a4ca3b04f4@default> <10c96362-297f-db97-d4a9-da3d66d4dd34@cs.ucla.edu> <83d0zf4g8d.fsf@gnu.org> <83vad63i2w.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522870549 12407 195.159.176.226 (4 Apr 2018 19:35:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 19:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 04 21:35:44 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f3oC8-00037E-K2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:35:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53292 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3oEE-0002vE-0Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:37:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3oDK-0002u2-HW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3oDG-0003QN-Gy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3oDG-0003Q8-C4; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1767 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f3oDF-00080C-U1; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:36:54 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Wed, 4 Apr 2018 12:29:48 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224326 Archived-At: > Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 12:29:48 -0700 > > In my new configuration I get different results. If I run: > > emacs -Q -eval "(describe-variable 'password-word-equivalents)" > > and immediately type C-x C-c to exit, gprof reports the following hot > spots. Although it is a bit discouraging that so much garbage collection > is occurring in such a simple use of Emacs, I suspect this is not Drew's > problem. You could perhaps remove GC from this equation by raising gc-cons-threshold?