From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 934a72c: User can specify files never subject t Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:41:24 +0300 Message-ID: <83o9gp9r6j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h8mif6hs.fsf@gmail.com> <831sdlb7zz.fsf@gnu.org> <877endz2se.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528213164 17434 195.159.176.226 (5 Jun 2018 15:39:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 15:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sds@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 05 17:39:20 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQE3L-0004S9-Sg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 17:39:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47605 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQE5T-0002V9-2W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:41:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQE5I-0002TR-H8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:41:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQE5H-000378-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQE5E-00034i-2x; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:41:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3938 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fQE5C-0001Uv-Dr; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:41:15 -0400 In-reply-to: <877endz2se.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28g?= =?utf-8?B?VMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Tue, 05 Jun 2018 16:11:29 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:226034 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Cc: sds@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 16:11:29 +0100 > > Yesterday, when cleaning up I noticed the commit. I guess you're right, > we might as well live with it, ...sigh. If the plan is to obsolete > flymake-proc.el anyway, maybe this has little influence. OK, thanks. > In a similar cleanup, I just pushed to master an obsoletion of a > variable introduced in 26.1 (but here with full backward compatibility > and a better alternative). Do you think this can make it into 26.2? Yes, I think so.