From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell* Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 21:48:51 +0300 Message-ID: <83o9cmafzg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sh1y535s.fsf@web.de> <8336tyc1ou.fsf@gnu.org> <83woraal0c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537815352 20876 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2018 18:55:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 24 20:55:47 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4W1L-0005Kl-Ho for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:55:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46493 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4W3S-00082L-3H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:57:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4W3J-00080M-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:57:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4Vuo-0003G7-Ni for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4Vuo-0003Fw-I5; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3852 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1g4Vun-0004Yf-J9; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:49:02 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:35:50 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230035 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:35:50 -0400 > > I thought accept-process-output waits for subprocess output and sit-for > waits for input events (and we don't have any direct fonction to wait for both > at the same time). The commentary to wait_reading_process_output tells a different story: Return positive if we received input from WAIT_PROC (or from any process if WAIT_PROC is null), zero if we attempted to receive input but got none, and negative if we didn't even try. */