From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image transformations Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 11:33:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83o91hmbzg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d0jdv68i.fsf@gnu.org> <20190617211332.GA55597@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83a7e6na26.fsf@gnu.org> <20190625183352.GA18019@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <838stplcgb.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9wri0yd.fsf@gnu.org> <20190628183604.GA51376@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83imsph4kj.fsf@gnu.org> <20190629194959.GA71373@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20190630143846.GA8886@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <831rydnx6u.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgqtmd8r.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="106030"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: alan@idiocy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 26 10:33:59 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqvfq-000RSY-JQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:33:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37360 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqvfo-00081R-Se for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 04:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43775) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqvfT-0007tD-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 04:33:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqvfQ-0001FK-DB; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 04:33:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1143 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hqvfN-0003Os-Mm; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 04:33:30 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:24:48 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238918 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: alan@idiocy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:24:48 +0200 > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > I'm not quite sure I follow you... If there are platforms without > > native image transforms, then we want to fall back on ImageMagick (if > > it's available), even on Emacs 27+. > > (And anyway, if the user says :rotate 91, then we want to do > ImageMagick, because we don't have a native transform for that yet.) We do? I thought we wanted to _avoid_ ImageMagick at all costs, more or less.