From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SOLVED] (was: very different start up for emacs master compared with 3 month ago) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:29:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83o90trvf3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sgqanxxk.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83blwy9vef.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvale3t6.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="80113"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 13 16:29:45 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hxXny-000Kg9-9T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:29:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52862 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxXnw-0006xn-QZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:29:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxXna-0006xV-6F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hxXnZ-0005ll-Jq; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1093 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hxXnY-0008HR-V9; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:29:17 -0400 In-reply-to: <87tvale3t6.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> (message from Uwe Brauer on Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:51:33 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239343 Archived-At: > From: Uwe Brauer > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:51:33 +0200 > > >> | Version | init file | without init | > >> |------------------------------------------+-----------+--------------| > >> | b06917a4912a60402025286d07d4a195749245c4 | 50 sec | 1-2 sec | > >> | 1d75604eaded6a8482d28d57bc8e6a4d99d5caee | 15 sec | 1-2 sec | > >> > >> #+end_src > >> > >> > >> Any idea whats up? > >> > >> How can I debug this? > > > Bisect your customizations to see which part takes the lion's share of > > the time, I'd say. > > It was my fault. I bisected different commits (using mercurial) > > My configuration script was > > > ./configure CFLAGS='-O0 -g3' --enable-checking='yes,glyphs' --enable-check-lisp-object-type --prefix=/opt/emacs27 --with-x-toolkit=athena --with-mailutils OK, an unoptimized build is expected to be about 2.5 to 3 times slower than the optimized one.