From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bug#37025: 27.0.50;
 smime signing and encryption does not work any longer
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 17:23:11 +0300
Message-ID: <83o90mmu28.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87sgq27tlb.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <837e7eqxms.fsf@gnu.org>
 <878srqodvn.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="146752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 18 16:23:22 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hzM5Z-000c0s-Rg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 16:23:21 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41378 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hzM5Y-0008VZ-56
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 10:23:20 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54463)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1hzM5S-0008VH-1U
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 10:23:15 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59506)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hzM5R-00038Z-JA; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 10:23:13 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3492 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hzM5Q-0001FE-OT; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 10:23:13 -0400
In-reply-to: <878srqodvn.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (message from Uwe Brauer on Sun, 18
 Aug 2019 14:29:48 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239436
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/239436>

> From: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:29:48 +0200
> 
> There was a second patch which checked the pgp version. However it is
> not clear to me what was agreed on. So what is the general polics in
> such a case.

We wait for a few days (a week or two) and if no one objects, we push.

> A change was introduced, which presented a bug for some use case, a
> fix was not agreed or applied.
> 
> So shouldn't that commit not be removed, at least temporally, till a fix
> is agreed upon?

Only if the problem is grave and very urgent.  In this case, I don't
think it is, and you can revert that commit locally in the meantime if
it gets in your way too much.