From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29) Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 21:53:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8yt1zap.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1697CA97-B2E6-4202-B14D-99DCF93954FD@acm.org> <02405f0d-788f-1b87-0269-b06eb2d67ff8@cs.ucla.edu> <83zhif4nq6.fsf@gnu.org> <6cf4485e-3d94-ce92-6342-d83cdc7f95d7@cs.ucla.edu> <83k19j4fw3.fsf@gnu.org> <2831f530-b702-50e0-e494-8620d5a0fdb5@cs.ucla.edu> <83muef2dmj.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftk53i74.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="42546"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 06 20:53:24 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBem-000Aw0-Dx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 20:53:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36344 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBek-0002XN-KC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:53:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48707) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBed-0002V8-I9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBed-0005sv-Bm; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2694 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBec-0004N0-8C; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:53:15 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Sun, 6 Oct 2019 10:33:34 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240660 Archived-At: > Cc: mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 10:33:34 -0700 > > On 10/6/19 10:19 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Can we please agree to make stylistic changes only if either (a) the > > change is in the code which is being modified/fixed anyway, or (b) the > > change doesn't affect the code produced from the modified source? > > That's what I did in this particular instance. Was it (a) or (b), according to your interpretation? > Obviously you disagree, but that's what I thought at the time, and > still do. Let's just agree to disagree; it's not worth arguing > about. We cannot agree to disagree on this, because it means we will keep bumping at this and arguing about such changes in the future. I'm trying to find a compromise that we all could live with.