From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should `revert-buffer' preserve text-scaling by default? Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 18:15:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83o8wqln5f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fti6toq7.fsf@red-bean.com> <83pnhao1re.fsf@gnu.org> <8736e6tm51.fsf@red-bean.com> <83imn1omkf.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0d8xxzu.fsf@red-bean.com> <8736e3scxq.fsf@red-bean.com> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="242972"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 02 17:15:32 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iboMG-0010v7-Jl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 17:15:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iboME-00057Q-Ob for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:15:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iboM4-00054u-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:15:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iboM3-0006wc-ON; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:15:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3985 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iboM3-0006PA-0u; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:15:19 -0500 In-reply-to: <8736e3scxq.fsf@red-bean.com> (message from Karl Fogel on Sun, 01 Dec 2019 20:01:37 -0600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243006 Archived-At: > From: Karl Fogel > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 20:01:37 -0600 > > Even though Eli unconvinced me of that earlier, it turns out I'm weak-minded enough to have already fallen back into thinking it's a good idea now that you suggest it. So I'm +1 on what you say, at least until Eli posts again? If we use a special value of the argument, not just C-u, I'm okay with that (and I think I already said that in this discussion, didn't I?).