From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Consistent face for keys in *Help* and `substitute-command-keys' Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:59:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83o8fpn64g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a6rhxwah.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmlxspt.fsf@gnu.org> <834khpxr0s.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x8ybw9.fsf@gnu.org> <87czwageno.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878s6xwngp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874khjq6p8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875z1ylrdw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83eegmok4v.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzamcky.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36353"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, juri@linkov.net To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 11 15:12:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKM3I-0009JV-2Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:12:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50224 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKM3H-00061X-2Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:12:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKLqe-0006ST-9A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:59:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKLqc-0005Lw-WC; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:59:31 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3044 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lKLqZ-0002WJ-SV; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:59:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:25:40 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266326 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:25:40 -0500 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, juri@linkov.net, stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> For the modeline, the solution was to use a negative width for the box. > > ^^^^^ > > You meant "height", right? > > I think I actually meant "thickness" (regardless of orientation), but > yes, the issue is clearly with the vertical size rather than the > horizontal one, sorry. AFAIR, the :box attribute can be asked to use one thickness in the horizontal dimension and another in the vertical one.