From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sv: Emacs HTTP libraries [was: Re: How to contribute new package to GNU ELPA?] Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:55:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8f0kaoj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r1jxd3d8.fsf@gnu.org> <8e549f23-db75-2ef1-4399-0fb52e5efa6f@gnu.org> <87zgykn5qc.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg4ckbfw.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtukn463.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28988"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arthur.miller@live.com, raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, db48x@db48x.net, darnir@gnu.org, adam@alphapapa.net, mardani29@yahoo.es, jemarch@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 15:56:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRErG-0007KY-0d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:56:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34346 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRErF-0004um-2W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lREqS-00047V-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lREqQ-0004zU-MI; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:55:46 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2819 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lREqP-0008SS-1j; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:55:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mtukn463.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:48:20 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267172 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: mardani29@yahoo.es, arthur.miller@live.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > db48x@db48x.net, darnir@gnu.org, adam@alphapapa.net, raman@google.com, > jemarch@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:48:20 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > We have the ability not to attempt decoding at all, don't we? So why > > is that still a problem? > > I don't know that it is. The last time I poked at this (which is a > couple years ago), I determined that the Emacs network/process handling > code was slow, but I got distracted before I found out why. I'd be surprised if the reason was decoding. I think, if it's still slow, the reason is elsewhere. But in any case, the effect of decoding is simple to measure, by binding coding-system's to 'no-conversion when opening the network stream.