From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:03:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8akqd0u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210727211521.15408.98852@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210727211523.AE6F72065F@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <877dhabg5s.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgu6h0e1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a6m6tn0e.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1figz3p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zgu4ri8b.fsf@gnus.org> <837dh8s6fj.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf5oqdem.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32854"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, leungbk@mailfence.com, juri@linkov.net To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 30 13:10:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9QPA-0008Nw-4w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:10:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55202 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9QP9-0000fn-0R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9QJC-0006uj-Gx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9QJ9-0005OR-Df; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1715 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9QJ9-0000FA-2S; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:04:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lf5oqdem.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:55:29 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271833 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Stefan Monnier , juri@linkov.net, > leungbk@mailfence.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:55:29 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I'm not sure it's a warning. It's an informative message, and some of > > them are always displayed during bootstrap. Making them warnings > > would then apply pressure on us to remove them, which we cannot easily > > do in the case of those other messages (unlike the one caused by the > > changeset in this bug). > > It informs about an unfortunate situation that should be fixed (and we > have indeed fixed them all). So it's a warning to me. We cannot do anything with some theses "warnings" shown at bootstrap time, so how would it be useful to display warnings there? > > My personal advice is to read carefully every line displayed by the > > build process, and not limit yourself to warnings. Messages that > > aren't supposed to appear during a normal build should be discovered > > regardless of whether they are warnings/errors or not. > > On the other hand, my personal advice is to use admin/emake, which > filters out all the junk so that you don't have to read anything > carefully. :-) I think this is sub-optimal, at least for active developers of Emacs. No one said a message shown by the build is only important when it's a warning.