From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Variable pitch text filling Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 20:47:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83o860qi1i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ilwft1ph.fsf@gnus.org> <83tufvukjj.fsf@gnu.org> <875ysbxal0.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7bvugxm.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfvessx6.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnkp9c3t.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee6wanra.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1awse4k.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfvc8kdw.fsf@gnus.org> <83czmgs7t1.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0go8ios.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl20s2dp.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnkojmny.fsf@gnus.org> <837dcos1oy.fsf@gnu.org> <87o860jm27.fsf@gnus.org> <831r2ws0jf.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsrcjkik.fsf@gnus.org> <83y254qkq3.fsf@gnu.org> <87y254i56e.fsf@gnus.org> <83tufsqkd3.fsf@gnu.org> <87tufsi3x7.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10833"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 19:51:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msUhC-0002bx-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 19:51:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42436 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msUhA-0008M4-JA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 13:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msUdU-0004Gj-Vt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 13:47:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=36050 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msUdU-0001bq-EG; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 13:47:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Fvx4IT7Zv+VB9bgrrhd4f2GX1d81AR3imuTxk6OtNSs=; b=HVerRHf3PzRf MNtwWrNyUprXT/4RC1hLUatZUsHjizSZparK8z1KYs9gyEpOmIVxs+tTO58nr6WS8zWCjN0ifdThi kneY1L6LTt8bf8b7+A1F2D51glZlVT84J2B0ScPXJt0qHK2vl2OuOR3bWycN+Q9e91qgnY24I3f+0 mZgMpHYuwk84eUWOEq3gY8lVH2QTpgLnJJ14FcjIPA8DEPB5R2DG/IGkhJDoqpyi2Ah6xXUM8yIjf T77VAYJb2QFFF/VSWQddUxQTdxN8Qe4ujXKPkv0kJs/9Wvm5mp5qaCgIXNp8WEiGJM9q7RevTpc3J x0Y3e3OGLHQG3yyGJc894g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3313 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msUdT-0001Vt-Rd; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 13:47:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tufsi3x7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 01 Dec 2021 19:19:16 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280674 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 19:19:16 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Why would you need the overall min-width, if each one of the "-" is as > > wide as "*" or "%" (whichever is wider)? > > That's not what we're going for, I think? The "-" should be made as > wide as a "normal character", but "%" is often wider. That's not the important part in my question, the important part is this: > IOW, why also have a condition on a whole when you already have > conditions on each one of its parts? Since the overall width is a sum of the widths of the individual characters, placing min-width on each character would also yield min-width on all of them together. Right?