From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tree-sitter api Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 09:36:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83o81l5mzs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a6gq5mxl.fsf@gmail.com> <877dbu5mgj.fsf@gmail.com> <0BB906F7-BD3A-41CC-9783-19AA16934497@gmail.com> <83pmplq9f3.fsf@gnu.org> <5B304D80-2969-4F59-9A90-412D0A284912@gmail.com> <83ilvbpsvl.fsf@gnu.org> <4A6F417A-EF74-40B6-9517-6C0947AB87A6@gmail.com> <83wnjmiork.fsf@gnu.org> <6D1CD758-2C6F-4843-9739-F2A5D5591648@gmail.com> <67183EAB-5D98-4211-B71B-4618D6266A15@gmail.com> <83lews90ft.fsf@gnu.org> <32CE637B-B9A6-4E1A-A6C5-B6A930D34299@gmail.com> <83h77g892o.fsf@gnu.org> <825205B8-238F-4772-A497-634F3F37D49B@gmail.com> <83pmm27ket.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee2i8jdf.fsf@gnus.org> <1935bcb9111df1e489b20b957e6aaa34@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <87tubdin22.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3988"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, psainty@orcon.net.nz, ubolonton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, yoavm448@gmail.com, john@yates-sheets.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 08:38:44 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1naAvk-0000tw-N6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 08:38:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33016 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naAvj-0006nW-Bh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 02:38:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naAtB-0005Pb-Oc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 02:36:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=47878 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naAtB-0000O8-43; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 02:36:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=2SU2Oi3qN43c0JLzv0P3kqJHGJ9plVPDwGh142Qmtms=; b=UyKEpoD3ljgt 1+XPAIR9uGg3sjeGfZ3zP/v8aAPvBbbFM45nyrk/ImTaOWC/O0dMVcePINcXSxgt75pTqLoZR/7Ij pkq3pkSoYUebIbjpXvJ1kLDcZGndMh+3i/Q8m9rq7/L8BhmChdLTyxQV1hs9iCd+qjFLrGgdk2eNV iOIVvvUy11LnAjC9B5775zkOkpKugvT7+w/EO3K2d3aK+2EzPI7ou2U4DTXKZJmBCLo/8PIEg1EYC VwTevlzEH6+RHo/w+/BUD+AwB+1p01DX3FA52uEKeXLa8/kG97he0Bf1rjR53TgH/TQx4hSjpVwo5 Pm4NWYMY1lephomGzOe9PA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1071 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naAt2-0004Q1-Ua; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 02:35:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tubdin22.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 01 Apr 2022 09:56:21 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287659 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: John Yates , Yuan Fu , > Richard Stallman , ubolonton@gmail.com, Emacs developers > , Eli Zaretskii , yoavm448@gmail.com, > Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 09:56:21 +0800 > > "treesit" sounds rather ambiguous and ugly, while "treesitt" is only 3 > letters away from "tree-sitter". Instead of bikeshedding over a name, > why not use shorthands to refer to "tree-sitter" in files where the > column number limit is actually important? Isn't that what shorthands > were intended to solve? As mentioned before, we don't want to use shorthands for core features, and I'm not even sure there's a good way of doing that when some of the feature is in primitives written in C.