From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding missing C-x 5 C-j and C-x t C-j commands Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 05:29:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83o7z36g7h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a6b9xs22.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> <83fsl16l5l.fsf@gnu.org> <871qwkyhfx.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> <86v8twyyx9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19705"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Howard Melman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 08 04:30:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nylSa-0004yy-Uh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 04:30:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35634 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nylSZ-0001mQ-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 22:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35610) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nylRa-00014h-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 22:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nylRa-0001Sy-DY; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 22:29:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=lUQ3Y6OBhAXyedRQNKXO0o5zlo8CvdSVtayzCQKLG78=; b=BdRR3XFDjBbE Ba6kv1yo9VwZBuPOIHAZ/oqF1sfnvFkc5a4akcSELcRveWxFxjO2RwbaKiwk4Gu/sBT3utihiQbkw g4E/GgWOdw5ZDNEeOkmebVIReSjSdrTlDneOk+5OFJJbxDPDq3VCAWLP3A+XDmkvjJ8gKwg4WGOMi F0mHKw3Av3tJ5cPfn5EbKfDGA8hvh+jAyWyY/RMqUQM539g2K6wIlmwZShDctK2ouUUUky5sQ1NPN n1UG5tzaGRxh0AR6vCsgWFP7OSbG3+jTTm/qGwbeOFINMUrobaASXX4/VtdjqgtZJON7t+gFjaGCg +oiYtc1kFp9wfp4VHA1KcA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4859 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nylRZ-0000En-QU; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 22:29:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Howard Melman on Tue, 07 Jun 2022 16:17:29 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290895 Archived-At: > From: Howard Melman > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 16:17:29 -0400 > > Juri Linkov writes: > > >>> We have the "C-x 5 5" prefix for purposes like this one. > >>> It's a great fallback, > >> > >> It shouldn't be a fallback. It should be "the new C-x 5" and it should > >> hopefully completely replace `C-x 5` at some point. > > > > Should the prefix `C-x 5` take keys from the `C-x` keymap? > > So any key in the `C-x` keymap will be automatically > > available in a key sequence starting with `C-x 5`? > > > > For example, `C-x C-d` is bound to `list-directory`, > > then the inferred `C-x 5 C-d` will show the output > > of `list-directory` in a new frame? > > I have a question the other way. I forgot that `C-x 5 .' > exists and tried `C-x 5 5 M-.' and was surprised to find it > didn't work (it opened in the same frame as if I just did > `M-.'. Is it supposed to work or should I open a bug? I suggest to file a bug report. If this is supposed to work the way it does, someone will explain there why. Thanks.