From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs master + org Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 05:38:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83o7x259wg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tu6v27yh.fsf@gnu.org> <6F871C02-AC26-4B89-B64B-E9F4ACACDBE7@acm.org> <83sfmf26b6.fsf@gnu.org> <835yja7o7j.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8ra5uee.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnbqcebn.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36581"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, gregory@heytings.org, mattiase@acm.org, philipk@posteo.net, silent2600@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 03 04:39:42 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJ4IP-0009M8-La for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 04:39:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51964 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJ4IO-0003E3-HE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:39:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJ4HJ-0002VA-MJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:38:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJ4HH-0000Yu-Lb; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:38:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=/qT28aUFUOqM1AauMUDF7SoPX0xfwZFirujq1NR54hc=; b=L6HqmBmb3sFo X2zITiBGxb/5It1N5znbi0gl26qTfE1aQ0RS5b8G1oSajYDftAoufWsYoNObU4wxawc6OcKJRzWLn MzOMmrBkgZfjCXLpFARjUN/0R6HcjJ9tRCzHUdKYheYFgTENL9vBNu2PjOKn2qiz6+9H3kDoZG74j Ov99qcZO+xO+W6MOqNCdtaeFUs5+n6lWFFfOzz7/4rphJ9Nxj5ITOr3e03faxpx4ZSIiZj1r2loJJ QQlvX72H6yhsgovg7XMXOvbw2wWsuB8Ta1H9R4n8DPkTtgqTQOC+9IvdyCJt7j1eK470Hq7eE6M2z 5GV6dGDJyRyoTpuANpoojA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1165 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJ4HH-000555-5L; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:38:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wnbqcebn.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Wed, 03 Aug 2022 09:21:00 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293001 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gregory@heytings.org, mattiase@acm.org, > philipk@posteo.net, silent2600@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 09:21:00 +0800 > > I agree with Alan. > > Is there really a slowdown associated with allowing code to widen > outside the bounds specified by redisplay long-line "optimizations"? Or > are we speculating about a hypothetical problem that doesn't exist > again? It isn't a hypothetical problem. You can try the examples posted here yourself, after disabling the feature. Try it once with and then without font-lock, and draw your own conclusions.