From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation and gc Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 22:07:28 +0200 Message-ID: <83o7oxu41r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i.ref@Ergus> <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i@Ergus> <87a60k657y.fsf@web.de> <838rg4zmg9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttys4dge.fsf@web.de> <83sfebyepp.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttyru4zt.fsf@web.de> <83fsabyb41.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt4jtpqf.fsf@web.de> <83ilf7wi48.fsf@gnu.org> <878rg3wh2f.fsf@localhost> <87a60jtg0z.fsf@web.de> <877cvmumjq.fsf@localhost> <83356aukkh.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1o2t45i.fsf@localhost> <83wn3mt33c.fsf@gnu.org> <87a60hvqlh.fsf@no.lan> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2941"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregor Zattler Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 12 21:08:34 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pbRzd-0000XM-Gs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 21:08:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbRyz-0007nn-Pj; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 16:07:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbRyy-0007nd-9c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 16:07:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbRyr-0005t2-Id; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 16:07:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=v26l4ElkVD+PVUpUceYPSquKC2TZDIp+Yy6minz5HPE=; b=C2cICpcEZgkh QRp8bnFIBKWS2u61F9MHZSZM8wh9aX0alL7BJV2LpO8wG7WotQVhUiS0AKUyHSlAa34q0b9T4H87f 36b8ofL3MOE9eRZmYLmXksUFORT6uaFZ/Bp78LwBAp3+AF5URTgVM0ymqOQJJB7KswFgeIprGZNb7 aXDDD2o0zMGRq+7FjSpDYt/zzVIjGVOnDiaDctLht08vO3FWK8xhQAHU0gVmGceNpHSGa8qkSJocD PA/nthac00W6V/Qed8UtGV7nr4jQ+K4JRXY2nNKwZMaos9uEt8SeYkldasJJ/M3tRVZ/hiPpQNY4N LAUkW4y5+elqgYAx6AKlVA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbRyp-00061w-T2; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 16:07:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a60hvqlh.fsf@no.lan> (message from Gregor Zattler on Sun, 12 Mar 2023 18:15:06 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304380 Archived-At: > From: Gregor Zattler > Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 18:15:06 +0100 > > Hi Eli, Ihor, emacs developers, > * Eli Zaretskii [2023-03-12; 17:13 +02]: > >> From: Ihor Radchenko > >> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 14:50:33 +0000 > >> Sure. Should we formally try to call for such benchmarks? > > > > Yes! > > at this point you have two different ideas of when to > measure (at the end of or at end of usage session) > (both could be asked for). > > And it's not clear, to me at least, which numbers > should be collected. That's okay, since we didn't ask yet. When we do, the questions will be detailed and clear. > It would be great if there would be an agreement on > what and when to measure and and where to send the > measurements. > > A function which as a side effect outputs the numbers > on interest would be helpful. > > I think it would be useful if they included > emacs-uptime at the moment of measurement and (if > possible) the total idle time. Your points are well taken!