From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Control help- and Info-mode buffers from other buffers Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 12:58:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83o7lzcxm8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h6ruf09e.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <861qixbum2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86wn0opgpi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86ilc78zc2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <834jnrek7w.fsf@gnu.org> <86v8g77iof.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="587"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Arthur Miller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 01 11:58:46 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q4f4w-000AWs-02 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 11:58:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q4f4A-0001uJ-4Z; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 05:57:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q4f47-0001pT-U0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 05:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q4f46-0007TM-CX; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 05:57:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=tRDW5coYLieuakCsX3+5SbvIoB+BD9/G1I6suti2Y2Y=; b=WzvhSBV1pesXG3+pwwE3 zmw1CH+W7KHQqhC+7gx2QqYOwhaUGGid45mClRJw5kFrz0rBy4i2bKvKRuMiJZXTwmhPht338hxyG Gx9+nflCPjKBLB7Ah5C2wxLiIrdo/U799qM2YA7XjtEJ0Fo31E90WmHkQ4GHnc85MQYnck3Tz24jv vTjpgM+9L7Gtktz+T39VGZE16EkjBVBmF05mM8Rl81oKxTePPjIluxvKyVqvYaucbmAVao8/WSe+d 7cmfc5aNWTrOIy8X7YnHmwmdLnlAJM+mvFBmf/Yz4PSPzaZwiM7JshNwuNjqFKOwsB41h1tBq9FpQ 7PC4Ps74yuw43w==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q4f45-0004IF-RN; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 05:57:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Arthur Miller on Thu, 01 Jun 2023 11:16:50 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:306501 Archived-At: > From: Arthur Miller > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 11:16:50 +0200 > > In general, (I think) that allow to support commands that are available in > selected-window, to be executed in other-window, but does not have access to > commands defined in other-window, and naturally we can't executed commands from > selected-window if they are not supported in other-window. With other words, if > set of commands from selected window is S and set of commands in other-window is > O, than this will work in on the intersect of those commands, S¡ÉO. Perhaps there > is more to it, but I think that is the minimal requirement (the commands has to > work on both buffers). I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say here. What exactly is the minimum requirement, and why? > Potentially it can also result in many bug repports and /r/Emacs threads where > people wonder why it does not work some command Foo in other buffer. If we have a good reason why it doesn't work, we will explain it. And if we don't have a good reason, we can add another binding. Where's the problem?