From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding support for xref jumping to headers/interfaces Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:28:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83o7ff8bc4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87il697r5g.fsf@catern.com> <87r0kw8nxu.fsf@catern.com> <3fe5a8cd-b355-d7eb-10ad-8846aef3387b@gutov.dev> <878r6mx1xc.fsf@betli.tmit.bme.hu> <90e4b9a7-3b51-587d-e317-b89e5d5464d9@gutov.dev> <87sf4scxax.fsf@betli.tmit.bme.hu> <77500777-aea2-14db-4aab-7a5dff43443b@gutov.dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10769"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, felician.nemeth@gmail.com, sbaugh@janestreet.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, me@eshelyaron.com, john@yates-sheets.org, spacibba@aol.com, fgunbin@fastmail.fm To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 27 16:29:49 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dYR-0002VK-AS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 16:29:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dXU-00051j-3J; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:28:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dXS-00051H-5d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:28:46 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r7dXQ-00036I-LI; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:28:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=IE7N3wdsMBFBqUibJ/79t9l8aHl4xSH+wBHWpqUnvHE=; b=XXDbD/CCghTJ0Tok0Xgc qBkci3O4ybR0FkBTzO95t0vfXYu7J7Ux+EuhrSxFCH09QRTgJzJ6nuCNE2xLaPZLQKm9G87/Vm3v6 D+TYbeO/iRlzuQ41MEXOGv+JV02Yw1z+ErMIRxX5w4A7g14ztHVBEQd3mOBQkZx/dtb7qPP/yBqJu yojCxfRiNeCA3jTTu4uFTgSUzbYQKF/P1812lHi3uFhjLm44VfqCh06h5vJH4v+TA2/rtO5jRW6IZ HqFKRT0o5FgANuuDco3TDAQQZiatA2Z9E9VYdEvXX4MOHWiWO45CFEKUSHBusWIWEcIhsR0W1Yyiv H5qBvKFu8pF68w==; In-Reply-To: <77500777-aea2-14db-4aab-7a5dff43443b@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:01:58 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:313276 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:01:58 +0200 > Cc: Felician Nemeth , > Spencer Baugh , emacs-devel@gnu.org, > Eshel Yaron , John Yates , > Ergus , Filipp Gunbin > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 27/11/2023 16:49, João Távora wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 2:43 PM Dmitry Gutov wrote: > > > >> (that's what the completing-read approach is for), and whenever we find > >> out that particular kinds get supported by many backends (or by most of > >> the available/popular ones), we could "pull them into the core", adding > >> a global command with one binding which would work across languages. > > > > Alright, so since this is contentious (who else but you is pushing > > this idea?) > > Indeed, I wonder if nobody else is interested in having the additional > commands have pre-defined bindings, or having the same bindings across > languages. I might be interested, but you guys have a tendency to drown the important issues in an ocean of second- and third-order stuff. It is very hard to follow this discussion, with its longish posts and a lot of barely-related issues and arguments. Maybe it's time to post some kind of summary?